Issues bought tense with Amber Heard in court docket as Johnny Depp’s lawyer grilled the actress a few $7 million donation she was presupposed to make to charity.
After she and Pirates of the Caribbean actor Johnny Depp divorced in 2016, Amber claimed that she didn’t need Johnny’s cash. As an alternative, she stated she needed to donate her $7 million divorce settlement, cut up equally between the Youngsters’s Hospital Los Angeles and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
Amber has testified in her present defamation trial that she was unable to donate nearly all of the cash as a result of Johnny sued her. Nonetheless, she stated below oath throughout Johnny’s previous libel case within the UK Excessive Court docket that she had already made the donation.
Some commentators now say she may face a perjury probe over allegations she lied below oath, however authorized specialists admitted this may be onerous to show and that she would doubtless not find yourself being prosecuted for it.
Amber Heard says she has not donated the entire $7 million she pledged
Throughout her testimony, Amber Heard addressed the charity donations and defined why she has not but made them.
Johnny Depp’s attorney Camille Vasquez tackled the difficulty with Amber head-on.
She requested, “As of at this time, you haven’t paid $3.5 million of your personal cash to the ACLU,” and “As of at this time you haven’t paid $3.5 million of your personal cash to the Youngsters’s Hospital of Los Angeles?”
Amber replied, “I’ve not but. Johnny sued me.”
Nonetheless, she continued by saying that she deliberate to honor her commitments as soon as she is not being sued by Johnny.
She stated, “I absolutely intend to honor all of my pledges. I’d love for him to cease suing me so I can.”
Johnny misplaced a libel case in opposition to UK newspaper The Solar in November 2020 and through that trial, Amber testified below oath that she had donated the settlement.
Perjury is defined as “The offense of willfully telling an untruth in a court docket after having taken an oath or affirmation.”
Nonetheless, perjury could be onerous to show as a result of the prosecution should present that the particular person in query deliberately lied below oath.
Lawyer Sean Caulfield, a associate on the regulation agency Hodge, Jones and Allen, told MailOnline, that Amber may in idea face a police probe.
“Whereas it is probably not a central difficulty to the case [the donations], perjury is the only largest menace and cuts to the core of our justice system,” he stated. “So the police could also be invited to research to point out that any member of the general public who lies to the court docket could be prosecuted for perjury.”
Nonetheless, he stated perjury is notoriously tough to show, and one other authorized skilled stated a probe was unlikely to lead to a prosecution as a result of legal professionals must show she knew what she stated was false.
Lawyer Mark Stephens instructed the outlet, “It’s notoriously tough to carry and prosecute a perjury case. You need to present that somebody intentionally instructed an untruth versus them being confused or misremembering. I feel it might be a really tough factor to do.
“Police may examine it, however they in all probability wouldn’t prosecute it.”
Johnny Depp sues Amber Heard for defamation
Johnny Depp filed a $50 million lawsuit in opposition to Amber Heard in 2019 for defamation. The swimsuit got here as a result of, in December 2018, Amber Heard wrote an article for The Washington Post and referred to herself within the article as “a public determine representing home abuse.”
Amber countersued for $100 million and claimed Johnny used the media to discredit her.